Snakes are often seen as a reincarnation of evil, of Satan by Christians but in Ancient Greece it was seen as an healer. Judaism sees the snake as a symbol of healing that can save you from imminent death. In fact isn't it now used as a symbol for pharmacies an on ambulances? Also in Wicca and Neo-Paganism, the snake has a positive meaning, of wisdom and knowledge. I know that in art the serpent is a symbol of sensuality.
In the Western world, some snakes (especially docile species such as the ball python and corn snake) are kept as pets. To meet this demand a captive breeding industry has developed. Snakes bred in captivity tend to make better pets and are considered preferable to wild caught specimens. Snakes can be very low maintenance pets, especially compared to more traditional species. They require minimal space, as most common species do not exceed five feet in length. Pet snakes can be fed relatively infrequently, usually once every 5–14 days. Certain snakes have a lifespan of more than 40 years if given proper care.
But here a personal thought of mine..I know some people who have a snake in their home, always kept inside a cage and they got it because it's cool to show to your friends you have such a dangerous wild and uncommon pet at home. To the question "why did you take a snake as a pet?" the most common answer is " Because it's cool and I love snakes". But..If you really love them you would absolutely NOT keep one at home in captivity closed in a small cage, away from his natural habitat and family!! If you really loved snakes you would leave them live their life in their place, not at yours! it might be cool for you to have a snake but have you ever asked the snake if it was cool for him to be locked alone where you put him?
Wild animals are called WILD for a reason..they must live in the wild. A snake is not a dog or a cat who is used to live among and along with humans. It a total other kind of animal so think well about it before getting one.
Anyway, snakes are not aggressive animals unless they feel threatened or are hungry and hunting for food. Most are non venoumous but their bite can be irritating and bring infection to your skin.
HEDGEHOGS:
eheh how cute are they? *-* I have many in my backyard, they come out at night. Many times my husky dog takes them inside my house to play with them xD
(Typical morning scene when I wake up xD ps. No, that's not my dog, I found this image on the internet :P)
As animals native to Europe, hedgehogs hold a rightful place in European folklore. Since the mammal did not possess any "righteous" qualities, it never made it to the court art; however, its relationship with fairy tales has been a long and fruitful one.
In most European countries, hedgehogs are believed to be a hard-working no-nonsense animal. This partially results from the folk belief that hedgehogs collect apples and mushrooms and carry them to their secret storage. It is unclear exactly how old this belief is, though the Roman author Pliny the Elder mentions hedgehogs gathering grapes by this method in his Naturalis Historia. In medieval bestiaries and other illuminated manuscripts dating from at least the 13th century onwards, hedgehogs are shown rolling on and impaling fruit to carry back to their dens. In fact, however, hedgehogs do not gather food to store for later consumption, relying on their deposited fat to survive hibernation. Nor is apple included in their usual diet (it has been suggested, however, that the hedgehogs may use juice of wild apples in order to get rid of parasites, similar to anting). The image remains an irresistible one to modern illustrators. Therefore, hedgehogs are often portrayed carrying apples - partially, to make them look cuter.
Hedgehogs are often pictured as fond of milk, while in reality, they are lactose-intolerant.
They are also often seen in pictures with an autumn-themed background, since the animal hibernates in piles of leaves. This also adds to the cute reputation of hedgehogs. In Great Britain, however, the human habit of lighting bonfires to celebrate Bonfire Night on November 5 has led to an increased risk to hedgehogs, who often choose to sleep in the piles of wood accumulated in gardens and parks beforehand. Television messages now remind viewers who might be lighting bonfires to check them first for the presence of hibernating hedgehogs.
During the 1970s and 1980s, hedgehogs were one of the poster animals for environment activists through Europe. A lot of hedgehogs were killed by traffic, and since the hedgehog already had an aura of a cute little friendly animal, the choice was nearly perfect.
Hedgehogs are a food source in many cultures. Hedgehogs were eaten in Ancient Egypt, and some recipes of the Late Middle Ages call for hedgehog meat. In the Middle East and especially among Bedouins, hedgehog meat is considered medicinal, and thought to cure rheumatism and arthritis. Romani people supposedly still eat it, and also use the blood and the fat for its supposed medicinal value. One method for killing the animal suggests holding it up by one of its hind legs and cutting off the tip of its nose when it unrolls, which kills it and drains the blood at the same time. The animal is then cleaned and boiled or roasted.
O.O ok this last part shocked me a little when I read it...I would never have the guts to kill an animal...!
Well, this is it. I had a lot of fun to search infos about this supposedly goth animals. Especially finding the cultural facts like their meaning in different countries. :) If you have other suggestions of animal that could be added to the list, tell me in the comments and who knows..there might be a part 4 ! :P
6 comments:
LOL thanks for the hedgie feature! My Kretek is so proud of herself now:)
Actually small cages make for more comfortable snakes as long as the cage isn't too small. If you put a snake in too big of an enclosure it will stress it out big time. Many species have no social-qualities and have no concept of "family" at all.
But really the devil is in the details. Captivity can be a great thing or a terrible thing depending on who is doing it & how. Many reptile enthusiasts got started by an impulsive "wow that's cool" pet purchase but then progressed from there to serious conservation work. If you start talking to the various herpetologists and people who run reptile rescues about how they got started they almost always say something like "well I was 14 years old and saw this really cool #whatever in a petshop and have been hooked ever since." Without all this many reptile species would be extinct right now.
This is BallerinaDark!Don't know why but i have problem with commenting :(
@sgath92: Thank you for your comment and for becoming a follower! :)
Usually captivity is a bad thing. It is also a reason on why these particular animals risk extinction. When put in captivity an animal doesn't get used to live in his natural enviroment. They become like kids, who always need their parents to get them food. So when you decide to put them back into nature, they don't know how to behave and instead of being predators they become the prey. I believe herpetologists use captivity only for serious reasons and for the less time possible. For example when the illegal traffic of exotic animals is stopped, they take care of these animals checking if they are alright and healing them. In fact I'm not against those people, I'm strictly against those who own a snake just to look cool..!:P
@Dirgesinger: You're welcome!! :)
There's a right way and a wrong way of bringing animals into captivity. Royal pythons didn't become popular in the pet trade until after the international community did a CITES study to see if it were possible to start a pet trade without decimating wild populations [I actually have the DVD from the 90s CITES study]. If people play by CITES rules wild populations aren't put at risk [the real risk that species faces is habitat loss]. It's a lot like fishing in that sense. Everything is better in moderation. Now if a species is threatened, the specimens in captivity should be breed as much as possible to try to augment the wild populations, but taking at risk species out of the wild for a "cool" factor is pretty stupid. They're trying to save the Eastern Indigo here in the US threw captive breeding and the herp hobbyists have successfully kept certain turtle species [that were already in captivity] around for years to decades after the wild ones had been extinct through habitat loss & over hunting [they are popular food items in some countries and most illegally taken out the wild are destined for people's dinner tables instead of pet shops].
Releasing snakes into the wild is like releasing fish into the wild. If they are put in the right environment they'll do ok unlike mammals that basically have to be deprogrammed first. That's why snakes aren't legal for pets in Hawaii [they're afraid of escaped pets ruining their ecosystem since the weather there would allow boas and pythons to easily thrive].
Its funny cats are mentioned in this blog entry: Cats do incredible damage to ecosystems because their owners routinely allow them to have free unrestricted access to the outdoors. You can actually watch bird species come close to extinction once you allow cats onto an island as pets. Then you have the escaped ones that start feral populations [cats actually breed much faster than dogs yet cats are normally allowed to go wherever they want outside while dogs must be contained by leases or fencing]. Plus their owners tend force body modifications onto them like amputating the last digit of their fingers [declawing] so they cannot scratch up furniture. The feral populations do prove that they can establish colonies "in the wild" without being dependent on humans. The problem there isn't so much what happens to the cats but what happens to the bird and small mammal populations near by!
I should add; captive born animals are usually so much better than wild-caught ones anyway. I would never buy a wild caught animal myself [I prefer rescues but I could see myself buying a captive born pet from a breeder that doesn't use wild caught animals]. That way you know they're more likely to be healthy & that you're not encouraging over harvesting of wild populations. Think of it this way; if we stopped capturing snakes and birds in the wild today; there are all these thousands upon thousands already captive that someone could go to instead. A self sustaining captive population is not unrealistic.
This is Ballerinadark (sorry there's a glitch on my pc that doesn't let me comment with my account >_<)
I understand your point of view sgath92! :) you seem to be very informed about this kind of animals. I wish people who own wild pets were as informed as you are but most aren't. In the US, snakes are very common, they are already in their natural habitat,so picking up one and taking it home may not be as devastating as importing an animal from example from Africa to Europe. In Europe snakes (especially those that people want as pet like pytons, boas and others) are very uncommon and certainly the habitat is not adequate. So maybe we don't agree in some points because we come from diffent places :P The last point of your comment is very interesting, I never thought of it that way. But I also think that we shouldn't interfere too much with evolution. If an animal get extincted, another will survive... :)
Post a Comment